Powerlifters love a good debate over the definition of Powerlifting. The purists say it’s only the Total of the 3 Powerlifts. Others say a Bench Press specialist is a Powerlifter. Push/Pull enthusiasts include themselves. Let’s explore these points, and add your own comments.
The debate of what makes a real Powerlifter is as varied as the lifters themselves. For many, the definition hinges on the commitment to the traditional trio of lifts: squat, bench press, and deadlift. Purists argue that to truly embody the spirit of Powerlifting, one must engage in all three lifts, with the ultimate goal being the Total—the combined weight of the best attempts in each discipline during a competition.
However, others push back against this rigid definition. Bench Press specialists, for example, often feel included in the Powerlifting community because of their dedication to mastering a single lift, showcasing exceptional strength and technical proficiency. They argue that specialization in one area should also be recognized and celebrated.
Then there are the Push/Pull enthusiasts, who focus exclusively on the bench press and deadlift. Their advocacy for inclusion stems from a shared culture and competitive spirit that binds all who participate in lifting, regardless of the total number of lifts performed. For them, the lines are blurred, and the joy of lifting—regardless of the specific events—validates their identity as Powerlifters.
This ongoing conversation invites us to ponder: What truly defines a Powerlifter? Is it the Total achieved across all three lifts, or the individual mastery of a specific lift? The beauty of Powerlifting lies in its diversity, and the rich tapestry of opinions only strengthens the community. So, what’s your take? Are you a purist, a specialist, or a hybrid lifter?
Powerlifting.com knows this article is weak. We had our robot write it for us. What do you think about what makes a Powerlifter? Add your comments here in the Comments section. Stay Strong!
